— By Kevin Montgomery (@kevinmonty) |
SFMTA seems to have abandoned their old policy of locking away their collection of 4077 photos taken following the 1906 Earthquake and Fire and have begun scanning the photos and posting them to Flickr. According to the Chronicle, the photos were taken by John Henry Mentz, the photographer for United Railroads, the city's transportation operator at the time:
Most of Mentz's pictures were locked away in files for years, and many have never been published before. They show the destruction of the city - and particularly of its cable car and electric streetcar system - together with work to rebuild public transit.
Of course, most of these photos remain in a small room in MTA's office; however, they seem to be slowly changing their tune. Below are some of the highlights of what they've released thus far:
While there isn't anything particularly shocking about the above photo of Sutter and Steiner, it's interesting to compare this block in the Western Addition to what it looks like today:
[Flickr]
Comments (32)
Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable | [Permalink]
Are you sure that is where Bender’s is? Because I think you’re off by a block. That house on the corner actually occupies the current location of WHIZ BURGER. See:
http://tinyurl.com/6yakgr2
AWESOME find/post, btw. Kudos!
Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable | [Permalink]
also: WAFFLES!
Kevin Montgomery | [Permalink]
You know, I think you’re right… I believe they mislabeled the photo (if it was taken between 18th and 19th and is looking south, it would have to be capturing the intersection at 19th… they likely meant between 17th + 18… as the design of the steeple looks the same).
Kevin Montgomery | [Permalink]
You know what, I take that back. SVN south from Whiz Burger is more of an incline… I’m not so convinced.
Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable | [Permalink]
It’s not just the steeple that is the same (right down to the trim) but also the surviving house in between the church and Whiz Burger looks the same.
I don’t think that the photo is so much MIS-labeled as it is MISLEADINGLY labeled. It says “between 18th and 19th st”, and that is basically what it is showing in the CENTER of the photo (as Whiz Burger sits at the corner of 18th and S. Van Ness.)
Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable | [Permalink]
that is to say, it is taken from a vantage-point maybe ¼ of the way up the block NORTH of 18th st.
johnny0 | [Permalink]
I’m with HDPDV - it was taken between north of 18th – technically between 18th and 17th, but looking at the block between 18th and 18th. Google Maps to the rescue.
Look for the columns on the house in front of the church. A little hard to see since our 1906 friend took the picture on the opposite side of the street as Mr. Google Car. Here’s a different angle of the building and the church (from 18th looking SW) to make it easier to see the columns.
njudah | [Permalink]
Very cool. This is an example of a simple thing the MTA could do that would make everyone happy and cost them nothing, and instead they just let this incredible history resource sit in a box. You’ve got to wonder what else they have hidden that might be cool to check out.
MrEricSir | [Permalink]
If the earthquake and fire had happened today, the entire city would have been eminent-domained and sold to a developer with financial ties to city hall. They then would have proceeded to build giant concrete buildings that took up entire blocks.
I don't think before I type | [Permalink]
How LeCorbusier.
Meow Meow | [Permalink]
Love the post and photos!!!
Side note: Sutter and Steiner is not Lower Haight, more like Western Addition/Lower Pac Heights.
gdb | [Permalink]
Agreed. That’s not the Lower Haight at all.
Kevin Montgomery | [Permalink]
Whoops! Missed that… fixed.
florabama | [Permalink]
correct me if i’m wrong, but anyone notice now the first photo is labeled howard st. between 18th and 19th streets. just where is that by the way? were streets renamed after the quake/fire?
Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable | [Permalink]
southern part of Howard St was renamed “South Van Ness”, yeah. Not cuz of the quake though, but apparently more because people thought that Howard St. had a negative connotation that they didn’t want to be associated with.
I don't think before I type | [Permalink]
That’s cute. Now I’d say that South Van Ness has a more negative connotation than Howard does.
Eric Fischer | [Permalink]
I don’t think it really had anything to do with negative connotations for Howard Street. The city government had been trying for years to connect the south end of Van Ness to *something* instead of having it dead-end into Market. A lot of the plans were going to connect it to Capp instead, but it ended up connecting to Howard mostly just because it was closer and therefore less expensive.
Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable | [Permalink]
That’s possible. I don’t have any factual references, it was just the story that I had always heard, that essentially merchants and residents of what is now S. Van Ness petitioned the city to change the name because they didn’t want to be associated with the negative connotations of Howard St. in SOMA (which, at that point, was the heart of skid row).
Erik | [Permalink]
Check out the “Bicycles for rent” sign in the Haight Street picture.
robert | [Permalink]
Photo six is Alamo Square looking downtown. Painted Ladies on the left.
Axis | [Permalink]
Today’s view of photo #3:
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=19th+and+south+van+ness,+san+francisco&lay…
Bernalwood | [Permalink]
“most of these photos remain in a small room in MTA’s office”
That’s literally true. I’ve been there. It’s intense. Here is that office:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/telstar/3219993041/
Joseph | [Permalink]
Why are they being so stingy about releasing these photos? They’re amazing and I want more! More! More!
Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable | [Permalink]
Same with the SFPL. I also want them to be scanned in at MUCH higher resolution!
Bernalwood | [Permalink]
It’s not so much stingy as worried about copyright and rather disorganized. (More of the latter, actually.) Remember, this is Muni we’re talking about here…
neighborhood local | [Permalink]
The photos of Sutter and Steiner are looking in the opposite direction!
What’s amazing, is how the buildings on the right side of the 1906 photo look pretty much the same today. It is the left side that has changed as shown in the recent photo.
The 1906 photo is looking west. The buildings on the right side of the street are in full sun, indicating the North side of the street. From the shadows you can tell the photo was taken right about noon. In the recent photo, the buildings are in complete shadow, indicating the south side of the street.
Bernalwood | [Permalink]
Here’s a photo of that “small room” where Muni/SFMTA keeps all its photo treasure. We could get lost in there for a very long time.
tigersmilk | [Permalink]
Is there anyway to purchase prints of these photos? The one taken of the city burning from Alamo Square is hanging in a cafe around the corner from my apt. I have asked where they got the photo but no one seems to know. Can anyway offer some advice. This would look pretty sweet in my apartment.
Kevin Montgomery | [Permalink]
I doubt it. The sfpl has a way to buy prints online, but I doubt MTA has their shot together
The Sanity Inspector | [Permalink]
A great find, thanks for posting!
sharon fisher | [Permalink]
wow, that picture of the Western Addition is very sad. No earthquake damage – just destroyed by urban renewal. sigh.
Joe | [Permalink]
Now SFMTA uses South Van Ness as there personal drag strip. Their policies have turned the street into an unsafe street. The traffic is way too fast and the buses are reckless.