City Wants More "Law-Abiding Citizens" to Visit Dolores Park
Crime in San Francisco's many parks is a Big! problem. And with all the hoodlums running amok and SFPD understaffed, Rec. & Park is looking towards the good citizens of San Francisco to reclaim their rightful public spaces (via food trucks).
From an editorial in today's Chronicle:
Dolores Park, in what should be a bucolic, family-oriented neighborhood, is being attacked by vandals who damage play structures and buildings and deface them with graffiti.
This is not new, of course. The very thing that attracts people to parks - wide-open spaces - also seems to attract unwelcome visitors.
Can this be stopped - ever?
Can it? CAN IT? However will we be saved?!
The Recreation and Park Department hopes to "activate" many parks - to encourage daytime and nighttime activities, such as farmers' markets, sporting events, food-truck days and expanded skateboarding programs like a popular one at Waller and Stanyan streets. The department also plans bike-rental programs to generate activity around parks and to plant trees and ornamental flower beds to inspire residents to take pride in their neighborhoods.
The idea is to encourage law-abiding citizens to use their own parks more - for their own enjoyment and to discourage undesirable elements from taking over space that belongs to everybody.
Apparently they are also calling for a "zero-tolerance" policy towards drugs and, with SFPD slated to hire 2,000 more officers to protect the citizenry from harming their own livers and lungs, increased "aggressive patrolling of the parks." And while I'm sure this is all fine and dandy, let's just call this what it is: a call for families to use the parks.
While this article is talking about all of San Francisco's parks, the example of Dolores Park is an interesting one. Dolores Park is quite obviously one of the highest trafficked parks in the city and surely 95+% of its users are law-abiding (unless you're boring and recognize the legitimacy of open-container laws, in which case 5% of the park is law-abiding), yet the very vandalism and crime the Chronicle detests persists. Pumping more people into the parks obviously won't clean it up in any meaningful way, unless actions are taken to change the very relaxed atmosphere of the public space--by extension, making it less public.
Can't the city just recognize that people want to drink in public and understand shitheads will be shitheads? This noise is getting old.
Comments
I blame Chelsea Clinton.
Abolishment of open container laws in CA is long overdue. This isn't Utah for fuck's sake.
or at least on the north(adult) side of the park. North of the bell.
When did the park become adult and non-adult. Is that the norm after the playground?
Believe it or not, about 4 yrs ago I was hanging around the green cargo container that used to be by the palm trees and these kids came over and told me that the park ranger had told them that they should "use their heads and stop being so dumb by drinking on the playground side" the kid told me to my face that the ranger had said" look,if u drink on that side(north orf the bell) then we won't mess with ya,just not near the play ground." I've always took this to be true,and it has seemed to be the norm. Why would I want to drink anywhere near children that would spill my beer or keep me from puffing a bowl.....
* the use of the word "kid" has nothing to do with age and i do belive these "kids" were of age to be drinking.
If they take my phun away, no one else should have phun either
Well, the SFPD let what goes on go on at 16th and Mission as part of their tacit "containment" policy (which you'll never hear them say in public, just like they'll never admit to ticket quotas which do exist in practice, I have several cousins in the SFPD and believe me containment & quotas are a reality). So the same logic SHOULD apply to Dolores. Better to have a place where people can get their drink/smoke on without bothering anyone, which is what Dolores has always been about.
The shift in policy isn't because of FAMILIES, it's because of those who feel a sense of ENTITLEMENT, many of which happen to be of child-bearing age and do have kids. That does not represent the majority of those of us in the Mission who have families. It's a subset which are the nouveau riche that will continue to grow in numbers in the neighborhood.
We need to let our voices be heard. I've said it before and I'll say it again, RUN, KEVIN, RUN, you'll have my vote.
why did i stumble upon this crapy liberast site?
Post new comment