The Night Tom Moosbrugger Killed the Hipsters

Alex, can I get terrible haircuts for $200?

Yesterday, a moment of cultural significance occurred with very little notice or attention: Tom Moosbrugger, a librarian from Columbus, Ohio, was the first hipster contestant on Jeopardy.  I know what you're thinking: this guy and his hoodless hoodie are not hipsters.  But consider this: he proved that getting a library science degree from a Midwestern state school isn't completely useless. You can just chill out, grow some rad facial hair, and win an average American income by answering questions about water fountains in an episode of Jeopardy.  He not only gets to perform minimal amount of work to receive some cash and a free trip to LA, but he also gets to solidify his intellectual superiority over Middle America.  The American hipster dream.

On the flip, Jeopardy is a show that's primarily watched in retirement homes and at the Old Country Buffet.  That's not to suggest grandpa is about to trade in his fanny pack for a neon green fanny pack and throw on a wolf shirt; rather, Tom is the flash point for the decline of the “hipster” subculture and its widespread acceptance into the mainstream.

Consider Demand Media and the recent proliferation of hipster-related “evergreen” content.  For the unfamiliar, Demand Media owns eHow and similar sites that make it their business to monetize popular search trends by producing “content” that is highly catered to sought-after Google search terms. In other words, unlike news, these pages will always generate revenue (“evergreen”), as people will continuously find the information useful and relevant.

Over the past few months, there has been an explosion of eHow articles describing how to act like, dress like, and be a hipster.  Most of these guides are so hilariously stereotypical, it's a struggle to imagine what types of newcomer hipsters find this information useful:

 

In addition to telling readers they'll only need “Pabst Blue Ribbon” and tight jeans to become a hipster, they instruct them to “quit your lame 9-to-5 job,” “move out of the suburbs,” “start collecting vinyl,” and, best of all, “Drink Pabst Blue Ribbon.”

“[PBR] is the preferred choice of beers among hipsters. It's cheap, which is convenient: once you become a hipster, you won't have much money.” - random eHow bro

While the eHow hipster clown car reads less like a how-to article and more like a help guide found in The Onion, Demand Media's writing of articles is an extremely calculated move.  The company employs scores of “SEO specialists” that spend their days analyzing search traffic to identify growing trends and market potential.  As the general rule of thumb in the “evergreen” industry is that the first search result will be clicked on 30% of the time, with the second result receiving a 5% clickthru rate, Demand Media's team of bean counters can predict how many people will read an article, click the embedded Google Ads on the article, and how much is necessary to pay a freelancer to ensure the company profits on the piece.  By definition, Demand Media is the trend-jumping poser of the internet, writing about a topic only after it reaches a commercial critical mass.

Demand Media and similar companies no one respects primarily mine Google Trends for keyword and topic analysis, suggesting that search volume is a barometer for the societal acceptance of a subculture.  For example, look at the stats for the query “How to dress like a hipster”:

And “hipster music”:

You can even see the transition from OG Hipsters drinking PBR (blue) and new wave kids drinking Tecate (red):

A classic battle between American, union-made products slowly losing ground to cheap Mexican goods.

Comparing the annual Halloween searches for “hipster costume” (blue) and “guido costume” (red) additionally suggests that the 'normies' of America have identified hipsters as a trending and relevant subculture to parody:

The data suggests that as the years have gone by, cultural outliers have increasingly wanted to be associated with the “hipster” subculture while lacking the knowledge of how to embody the lifestyle directly.  People increasingly are looking to be told how to dress, what to listen to, and how to act, rather than finding their own way.  Like the hippie lifestyle of the 70s, the hipster mores of individualism have been lost to crowds of people yearning for acceptance.

Looking back to Tom Moosbrugger, you see a man who publicly depicts himself on Facebook as your everyday, wild-haired bro who wears American Apparel hoodies, flannel shirts, and whose interests include the A-Team, Knight Rider, The Big Lebowski, MacGyver, “Indie Stuff”, collecting mold spores, and Ernest Hemingway.  But rather than being himself on national television, he fashions himself with a trendy “I'm gunna rape you” haircut, proving once and for all that the hipster subculture has been co-opted by the followers and style-conscious, begging for the attention of the masses.

Comments (31)

So, what is the point of this article? That Tom, my boyfriend, did not appear to be a hipster on Jeopardy, but since you facebook stalked him you know that in fact he is a hipster in real life and you are for some reason disappointed that he didn’t present himself as such on a 30 minute quiz show? Perhaps the point of this article should be that facebook stalking a stranger does not give you enough insight to his character to draw conclusions about whether he was “being himself” when you saw him on television, and furthermore why should it matter to you whether he accurately depicts himself in 30 minutes while answering trivia questions? Also, why is everybody so concerned over who is a hipster and who is not? As far as I can tell, this article is meant to convey that people who present themselves as hipsters are doing so in a manner that is superficial and shallow, using the question information found on the internet to shape their public personas. But this article itself is shallow, is is trite, and presumptuous, using the internet to extract information which turns out to be false–Tom did not get a free trip to LA, Tom is very hardworking, and has never worn an American Apparel hoodie. It’s one of those things so worthless I’m almost embarrassed to respond to it. I am admittedly taking this personally because I care about Tom, but There is some truth presented here, however–Tom does have a pretty rad beard.

saying someone isn’t a hipster is the first sign they are a hipster

his FB status doesn’t say he’s in a relationship, Mary. Best watch your back. He’s cute & smart & now has FAME

He is quite famous now. I suppose I will learn to accept that he has thrown me to the curb by means of FB privacy settings. Such is the life of a hipster Jeopardy contestant’s once and former partner.

+1

Well said.

Aww Mary, don’t take it personally, Uptown Almanac is often useful or at least good for a laugh or an interesting comment, but this post is a total joke. It’s awesome a long-hair contemporary of ours ended up on Jeopardy!

Haha, I mean, geez, trying to use a recent episode of Jeopardy to prove the already proven idea that underground shit is becoming mainstream is the most retarded thing ever. I used to have these half-baked ideas when I was 19, and that was like 2001, geeeeeeeeez.

Ok, thank you, I like you. I guess there is something just a little bit unnerving about finding an article about some random dude sifting through facebook photos of your sweetie, and quoting his profile, even though you throw all that information onto the internet yourself and then appear on national television. Somehow I still have this illusion that people will preserve each others’ privacy even though they have the means to invade it.

Wow. LULZ!!!!

Oh Mary… you make some really strong points. But the idea that I’m a stalker, or a “Facebook stalker,” is completely ludicrous. The only reason I even looked at his FB profile is I originally wrote something along the lines of “last night this dude proved that a history degree from a small liberal arts college isn’t completely useless.” Then a fellow UA author raised the point that he might not have gone to a small liberal arts college/studied history. “Good call,” I thought. So I googled his name (given on the show) and “columbus ohio” (mentioned on the show), and his profile was the first result. The idea that I combed through his pictures and contacts is pure crazy talk… I saw he went to Kent (not a small liberal arts college), didn’t study history, saw that he publicly listed all his interests (which is naive, if not crazy) and thought that it made the overall point stronger.

As for preserving privacy on the internet… don’t (publicly) share anything you don’t want the world to know (and potentially ridicule you over). Recommended watching: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Live_in_Public

Wait, you thought you were making an “overall point?” What was it?

The fact is, Tom DID get a degree in history (not from Kent), not that I understand what difference it makes to you if he majored in history or library science or both or where he got his degrees (or why it even makes sense that you began writing an article stating that he was a history student from a liberal arts school without having any sound reason to believe these things were true). Regardless, I am still having trouble understanding why the things you think you know about Tom are noteworthy–I would be very surprised if he was the first person to study either subject to appear on Jeopardy. Furthermore, I believe the idea that it is possible for a person to definitively list “all his interests” on facebook (or anywhere) and that a stranger such as yourself can therefore draw meaningful conclusions about that person based on viewing their facebook profile is “naive, if not crazy.” Just because someone has a facebook profile does not mean that viewing it permits honest, comprehensive insight into every aspect of their life and character.

Lastly (hopefully), I do not understand the implications you are trying to suggest are attached to things like enjoying Ernest Hemingway, wearing hoodies, or studying library science. To me there are no conclusions to draw about a person based on these characteristics. You seem to be drawing generalizations in a dangerously ignorant and self righteous manner. I am disturbed that you are applying seemingly nonsensical and blanket stereotypes for (what seems to me to be the sole) purpose of nitpicking an individual’s character. From my perspective, this is indicative of a much more severe and far-reaching cultural problem than a library scientist who wears hoodies appearing on Jeopardy.

That was for comedic value… I found his list pretty hilarious… especially once you got to the mold + fungus part of the whole thing. I’m not saying I was laughing at him, rather it seemed he throwing all that in there to be random. I generally appreciate the use of randomness in comedy.

Some of my best friends also studied library science from midwestern state schools… I wouldn’t think anything more or less of anyone based on what they studied. Sorry you feel the need to obsess over everything and nitpick.

it seems like you’re the one who is nitpicky and obsessive, kevin montgomery, because you’re the one who wrote this article.

you are probably just upset because mary thoroughly called you out. but what do you expect a girl to do when some douchewad talks shit about her man on the internet… if she’s eloquent about it, don’t hate. (she probably just wants to be better than middle america.)

i just wanna say that library science is a very useful degree, you can actually get a job that you’re qualified for! better than my philosophy degree, i’ll tell you what.

sumpen about folks from Ohio. kinda quiet. keep to themselves….

Can I throw a wrench in your graph and say I prefer Hamm’s?

“Individuality”? What’s so unique about being “different like the rest” of the kids in the Mission? Seriously, this should end here. “Hipster” is just a lame club to belong to, like sorority hoe, Jersey SHore db bro, thug, etc. these days.

Concur.

Man, there is so much wrong with this post, I can’t even begin to waste my time pointing it out.

:effort:

I’m not sure how appearing on Jeopardy qualifies as making a social statement in one way or another, unless I suppose, you’re in a nursing home, and suffering from the many health problems that pay for every commercial during Jeopardy’s time slot. The grand prize in Jeopardy is a stack of money, maybe some fame that translates into other walks of life, and a sense of knowing that you’re now entirely overqualified for trivia contests. I don’t see that as a “hipster-only” set of ideals. If the prize was a shipping crate of PBR, fixed-gear bikes, and vintage jeans, then maybe you’d have a point, assuming that Tom Moosebrugger, whoever he is, actually identifies himself as a hipster.

If anything, the winner of Jeopardy during the night Mr. Moosbrugger competed should be chastized. The guy writes trivia questions for a living, and somehow was allowed onto Jeopardy.

*Golf claps*

wow… nice bit of research
“Demand Media owns sites such as eHow, Examiner.com, and Associated Content”

while they do own eHow.com, they do NOT own Examiner.com (Clarity Media) or Associated Content (Yahoo). How did you even come up with that?

Editorial oversight. It meant to say something along the lines of “and similar sites…” It’s been corrected.

Since when did a zip up cardigan become a hoodie-less hoodie…

And I think the collecting mold hobby is a reference to Spangler from Ghostbusters

Aww, cheer up buttercup. I’m sorry the novelist thing didn’t work out and now you’re turning out worthless dribble on the internet. It will get better.

I know! I’m so bummed out nobody bought the book I never wrote!