SF Weekly Generously Reveals the Vote Count for their Web Awards!

Seriously. In the words of someone much wiser than myself, “if you’re picking people who are good at internet, maybe you should be better at it yourself?” Also, daaaaaaaaang, YOU GUYS REALLY. Finally, TOTALLY VOTE FOR US, riiiiiiight? It looks like about thirty people have voted and there are about thirty people who read this site so we can take this with very little effort. OH MAN NOW WHEN IF WE DON’T WIN SO EMBARRASSING. 

 

Comments (10)

what’s even more amazing is how few people have voted. Note all the “1 votes” except for one blog…one that has been actively campaigning for this since the start….innnnnnnnnteresting……….

Are you implying my “1 votes” aren’t any good??

Actually the twitpic one shouldn’t be nominated, because we didn’t take that picture.

no just that it’s funny that’s all.

Is there anything stopping me from voting for myself a hundred times?

no but voting is over now…

If you’re calling yourself a sex blogger and a food blogger and a government site, then you’re probably doing the “Social Media Expert” part wrong.

Miki Johnson, we’re looking at you.

Yeah, we basically took Miki Johnson out completely. Nice try though.

Oops! Nice Google work guys – Think you’re still in the running for “Best Hipster Blog” despite the dearth of votes. :-)

To make it clear to your (and my) thirty readers, this very hush hush tally is just for reader nominees, and other nominees can be chosen, etc – hence Uptown Almanac’s nomination.

Ultimately the winners are in the hands of the judges, of which UA’s esteemed Kevin Montgomery is one.

Hope to see you all on the dancefloor ( http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=370770816033&ref=mf).

– Alexia

Will you play Pitbull’s Calle Ocho?